What price do you put on a human life?
Since I last wrote, we’ve had the Manchester bombing, the London and Westminster Bridge killings, a general election and most recently the fatal attack on Muslims in Finsbury Park and the terrible fire at Grenfell Tower.
There
has been much soul-searching over the murderous terrorist atrocities which
killed and permanently disabled so many innocent people in London and
Manchester. Were they preventable? Could more have been done to avert them?
Sadly the conclusion seems to be that it is almost impossible to stop murderous
individuals from blowing themselves up, running people over after hiring a
truck or running amuck with knives. Nevertheless, the government will speedily
invest millions of pounds in anti-terrorism measures and rapidly deploy new
legislation to counter the perceived threat.
But
what about the response to the tragedy of Grenfell Tower and the needless loss
of so many innocent lives? It is beginning to look like this horror was largely
preventable, and the warnings were ignored or dismissed as alarmist.
Grenfell
Tower residents had repeatedly raised concerns regarding the safety of their
building; the local authority chose to ignore the warnings. A refurbishment
programme primarily designed to “beautify” the tower block to make it less of
“an eyesore” for the wealthy homeowners living nearby used cheaper cladding
which it now seems clear did not meet fire safety standards. A Coroners report
based on a similar fire in a tower block in Southwark made a number of fire
protection recommendations none of which have seen the light of day, despite
repeated calls from an all-party parliamentary committee on fire safety. As if
the devastating consequences of the fire itself weren’t enough Kensington and
Chelsea’s response to the disaster was utterly shambolic and dismissive. Local
people had to rally round and provide for each other, and days after the fire
there was still a lack of leadership, coordination and organisation. Even the
Prime Minister chose to meet exhausted fire crews rather than mingle with the
devastated survivors of the fire.
One
of the conclusions I draw from this terrible, preventable tragedy is that if
you’re poor, or an immigrant, an ethnic minority, disabled or old, your life is
worth less when compared to those who are not from those groups.
One commentator
put it rather well; “The Shard is a tower block if it caught fire would there
be such catastrophic consequences”. I think we know the answer to that
question.
Luxury high rise buildings in London
Another
commentator remarked when discussing the Grenfell Tower fire that “housing for
the poor will always be poor housing”. Buildings constructed for people who are
more comfortably off tend not compromise on safety standards; whereas
penny-pinching, shoddy maintenance, avoidance or enforcement of building
regulations and delay are the name of the game for those dependent on social
housing.
A fitting epitaph for all those who died would surely be that
lessons are learned. The government should act swiftly to strengthen fire
safety regulations just as they would have done if this had been an act of
terrorism. The public enquiry needs to publish its findings as quickly as
possible, and if required the government should bring forward new legislation
without delay just as it would have done if this disaster had been caused by a
terrorist act. The government should spend whatever is required to ensure that
people are kept safe just as they do when we are threatened by terrorism. If
these things come to pass then those who died will not have died in vain.
Comments
Post a Comment
We welcome debate, feedback and comments so please feel free contribute or contact us.